Signature or other authority over a foreign account
Short answer
For the FBAR, signature or other authority is the authority of an individual, alone or together with someone else, to control the disposition of money, funds or other assets in a financial account by direct communication, in writing or otherwise, to the institution that maintains the account.Source 1Source 2
A U.S. person can have an FBAR filing requirement through that authority without owning the account, for example over an employer’s foreign account.Source 1Source 2 The underlying account must also fall within the FBAR financial-account rules. What matters is what the institution will act on, not a job title: IRS guidance states that supervising the people who communicate with the institution is not, by itself, signature authority.Source 3Source 4
FinCEN’s test is whether the financial institution will act upon a direct communication from that individual regarding the disposition of assets in the account.Source 3
Financial interest and signature authority are different relationships
The FBAR requirement covers a U.S. person with a financial interest in, or signature or other authority over, a foreign financial account.Source 1 The two relationships are reported differently.Source 2
A person can have both relationships with the same account. Accounts over which you have signature or other authority are included when you work out whether your aggregate value exceeded $10,000.Source 4 See how the $10,000 aggregate threshold works.
The definition: control by direct communication
Definition
“Signature or other authority means the authority of an individual (alone or in conjunction with another) to control the disposition of money, funds or other assets held in a financial account by direct communication (whether in writing or otherwise) to the person with whom the financial account is maintained.”Source 1
When FinCEN adopted this wording in 2011, it explained that the test is whether the foreign financial institution will act upon a direct communication from that individual regarding the disposition of assets in the account.Source 3 Three parts of the definition carry most of the weight:
- Direct communication. FinCEN added the word “directly” so that the requirement applies to an individual who has the authority to deliver instructions directly to the foreign financial institution.Source 3
- In writing or otherwise. The communication is not limited to a signed paper instruction.Source 1
- Alone or in conjunction with another. FinCEN explains that this covers institutions that require a direct communication from more than one individual to move assets.Source 3
Only individuals can have signature authority; authority attributed to an entity is exercised by individuals.Source 4
What IRS guidance does not treat as signature authority
IRS examination guidance lists individuals who are not considered to have signature authority:Source 4
- individuals who can only buy or sell investments within the account, with no authority to disburse assets from it;
- individuals with supervisory authority over the people who communicate with the institution maintaining the account. The IRS adds that FinCEN clarified that approving a disbursement that a subordinate orders is not signature authority.
FinCEN revised its proposed definition after commenters asked whether it would reach someone who merely participates in the decision to allocate assets or can instruct or supervise others with signature authority.Source 3
Applying the test to online banking and payment approvals
Interpretation
Points toward authority: the institution identifies you individually and will act on your instruction or approval to move assets, alone or as one of the approvals it requires. Because the communication can be “in writing or otherwise”, an authenticated approval through the bank’s own online banking can be such a communication.Source 1Source 3
Points away from authority: you can only view balances or download statements; you can prepare a payment but someone else releases it to the bank; or your approval happens only inside your employer’s internal systems and the bank never receives or relies on it. In each case the institution is not acting on a communication from you.Source 3Source 4
Fact-specific: automated connections such as bank APIs, host-to-host links or a central payment factory, where it is unclear whether an individual’s action forms part of the instruction the institution acts on. These set-ups do not fit a one-line rule.
Facts that usually matter:
- Does the institution identify you individually, for example by your own credentials or mandate?
- Does your authorization reach the institution, and does it rely on it before moving assets?
- Can your authorization work alone, or only together with another person’s?
- Is your action bank-facing, or used only inside your employer’s internal workflow?
- Are you limited to viewing, preparing, or buying and selling investments within the account?
Examples
Example A
Bank-portal approver
You use bank-issued credentials to approve payments from your employer’s foreign account. The bank records your approval and will not release a payment until it has it, possibly together with a second approver’s. This points toward signature authority: the institution acts on your direct communication, alone or with another person’s.Source 1Source 3
Example B
Internal payment-workflow approver
You approve payments in your employer’s internal finance or payment-workflow system. The bank never receives your approval and would not accept a payment instruction from you; a colleague or a separate process sends the executable instruction. This points away from signature authority: the bank is not acting on a communication from you.Source 3Source 4
Example CFact-specific
Host-to-host connection or payment factory
Payments reach the bank from a central treasury system over an automated connection. You have a role in that system, but it is unclear whether the bank treats any individual’s action as the authorization it relies on. The answer depends on how the arrangement works in practice and how the institution’s mandate is set up; this is the kind of case to review with a qualified adviser rather than resolve by analogy.
Employer accounts
An individual reporting only signature authority still files as an individual on the FBAR.Source 7 For each account, Part IV asks for the account information, the account owner’s name, taxpayer identification number and address, and the filer’s title in the position that gives the signature authority.Source 2
- A U.S. person who lives outside the United States, is an officer or employee of an employer located outside the United States, and has signature authority over that employer’s foreign account completes only Part I and the employer information in Part IV, once.Source 2Source 4
- Someone with signature authority over, but no financial interest in, 25 or more foreign accounts gives the number of accounts and the account-owner information instead of the details of each account.Source 1Source 2
- An officer or employee who files to report signature authority over an employer’s foreign account is not required to personally keep records on those accounts; the IRS says the employer must keep them.Source 2Source 5
The regulation requires reporting for each year in which the relationship exists.Source 1 If a filing is required, see how to file an FBAR yourself for the submission and recordkeeping sequence.
Exceptions for certain officers and employees
An officer or employee who has signature authority over, but no financial interest in, a foreign account does not need to report that authority in these situations:Source 1Source 2
- accounts owned or maintained by a bank examined by the OCC, the Federal Reserve, the FDIC, the Office of Thrift Supervision or the NCUA, where the person is an officer or employee of that bank;
- accounts owned or maintained by a financial institution registered with and examined by the SEC or the CFTC, where the person is an officer or employee of that institution;
- accounts of an SEC-registered investment company, where the person is an officer or employee of an Authorized Service Provider to it;
- accounts of an entity with equity securities (or American depository receipts) listed on a U.S. national securities exchange, where the person is an officer or employee of that entity;
- accounts of a U.S. subsidiary of such a listed U.S. entity, where the person is an officer or employee of the subsidiary and the subsidiary is included in the parent’s consolidated FBAR;
- accounts of an entity with equity securities (or American depository receipts) registered under section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act, where the person is an officer or employee of that entity.
Each exception depends on the type of entity and on the person having no financial interest in the account. The full conditions are in the regulation and the Form 114 instructions.Source 1Source 2
Extended due date for certain individuals
Since 2011, FinCEN has repeatedly extended the FBAR due date for certain individuals with signature authority over, but no financial interest in, foreign financial accounts, while it considers proposed changes to the exemptions.Source 4Source 6 The extension applies only to the individuals described in those notices, not to everyone with signature authority.Source 5Source 6
FinCEN’s notice of December 8, 2025 (FIN-2025-NTC3) extends the due date to April 15, 2027 for the individuals whose due date for reporting signature authority was extended by the previous notice, covering signature authority held during calendar year 2025 and the earlier years already extended. For all other individuals with an FBAR filing obligation for 2025, the due date remains April 15, 2026.Source 6 Check FinCEN’s current notices for later years.
Related questions
Does having online banking access give me signature authority?
Can I have an FBAR requirement for an account I do not own?
We need two approvers to move funds. Does each approver have authority?
Does approving a payment my team prepared count?
IRS guidance, describing supervisors of the people who communicate with the bank, says approving a disbursement that a subordinate orders is not signature authority.Source 4 Where the bank itself requires and acts on your approval, the “in conjunction with another” part of the definition becomes relevant, and the facts need a closer look.Source 1Source 3
Does the extended due date apply to me?
Only if you are one of the individuals described in FinCEN’s notices, which concern certain individuals with signature authority over, but no financial interest in, foreign accounts. For other 2025 filers the due date remains April 15, 2026.Source 6
Next pages
Sources
Official sources used for this page.
Source 1: eCFR, 31 CFR § 1010.350 (opens in a new tab)
Definition of signature or other authority, the officer and employee exceptions, and reporting for each year.
ecfr.govChecked Back to text
Source 2: FinCEN, FinCEN Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR) Electronic Filing Requirements (opens in a new tab)
Signature-authority definition, exceptions, Part IV reporting and the records exception.
bsaefiling.fincen.govChecked Source updated Back to text
Source 3: Federal Register, Amendment to the Bank Secrecy Act Regulations — Reports of Foreign Financial Accounts (76 FR 10234) (opens in a new tab)
FinCEN’s explanation of the direct-communication test and of authority exercised jointly.
federalregister.govChecked Source updated Back to text
Source 4: IRS, IRM 4.26.16 — Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (opens in a new tab)
Who is not considered to have signature authority, and aggregation of signature-authority accounts.
irs.govChecked Source updated Back to text
Source 5: IRS, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR) (opens in a new tab)
Continuing due-date extensions for certain employees and officers, and employer records.
irs.govChecked Back to text
Source 6: FinCEN, FBAR Filing Requirement for Certain Financial Professionals (FIN-2025-NTC3) (opens in a new tab)
Extension to April 15, 2027 for certain individuals with signature authority but no financial interest.
fincen.govChecked Source updated Back to text
Source 7: FinCEN, Individuals vs CPA, Attorney and Paid Tax Preparers (opens in a new tab)
Individual-filer classification, including a natural person filing because of signature authority without financial interest.
fincen.govChecked Back to text